myavr.info Personal Growth Ipc Pdf In Telugu

IPC PDF IN TELUGU

Friday, May 31, 2019


1, Telugu Glossary, , Download ( MB) pdf, 08/08/ 2, The Code 3, The Indian Penal Code (45 of ), 45, , Download ( MB) pdf. police sections list telugu ipc sections list in telugu pdf law sections list in telugu pdf myavr.info GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LAW. Page 2. Page 3. Page 4. Page 5. Page 6. Page 7. Page 8. Page 9. Page Page Page Page


Author:MASAKO SHURKUS
Language:English, Spanish, Portuguese
Country:Finland
Genre:Politics & Laws
Pages:532
Published (Last):10.11.2015
ISBN:437-9-30798-777-6
ePub File Size:18.56 MB
PDF File Size:10.29 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Regsitration Required]
Downloads:25991
Uploaded by: ETHYL

A list of all the Sections in Indian Penal Code, , a.k.a IPC India, in a mobile friendly format, by Advocate Raman Devgan. myavr.info - Buy Indian Penal Code, Study Material (Telugu) book online at best prices in India on myavr.info Read Indian Penal Code, Study. The app acknowledge about Indian Penal Code (IPC) in different Languages with pictorial action. The app consists of act title in various Languages: 1.

Her father- in-law also misbehaved with her quite often. It is the duty of the court to prevent any of these abusers from escaping. The increasing rate of bride burning for want of more dowry and brutal torture of young wives, together with a clear escape of the abuser is a clear indication that the court has not taken any strong measures for the implementation of S.

As stated earlier many a times this victim turns into the abuser and is clearly not wronged but instead wrongs the husband and his family for no fault of theirs.

Breaking: Supreme Court Issues New Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of S.498A IPC [Read Judgment]

Several cases show that the married woman takes advantage of the section and sends the respondents to jail under the ambit of this section. But this still does not change the truth that there is slowly a rise in the abuse of S. In many judgments, the court has not considered mental cruelty caused to the woman but has concentrated only on any sign of physical cruelty. If evidence does not show that the woman was physically harassed, then the court does not look into the case.

Experts & Views

What the court does is call the woman hyper- sensitive [11] or of low tolerance level and having an unstable mind [12]. Also S. The judges have in several instances made a very narrow interpretation of this section, considering it to be only cruelty in relation to unlawful demands or dowry demands. Here, considering the woman to be a hyper- sensitive woman not used to usual wear and tear of social life is completely erroneous. In the case of Bomma Ilaiah v State of AP [16] the husband of the complainant tortured the woman physically by forcing his wife to have sexual intercourse with him.

He inserted his fingers and a stick in her vagina, causing severe pains and bleeding but the court found the husband of this Woman guilty only under S. Her life both physically and Mentally was at risk. The court has in another case not punished the guilty under S.

This was simply because According to the court, even though there were dowry demands in the past, the court felt that Proximity of the death to be caused due to such a demand was unlikely [17]. Who decides this Proximity? Misuse of Section A in Modern World: A violation of this section, its goals and its aims is on the rise with the woman frivolously making false allegations against their husbands with the purpose of getting rid of them or simply hurting the family. The abuse of this section is rapidly increasing and the women often well- educated know that this section is both cognizable and non-bailable and impromptu works on the complaint of the woman and placing the man behind bars.

The court believed that authorities and lawmakers had to review the situation and legal provisions to prevent such from taking place. This section was made keeping in mind protection of the married woman from unscrupulous husbands but is clearly misused by few women and again this is strictly condemned in Saritha v R.

Ramachandran [19] where the court did notice that the reverse trend and asked the law Commission and Parliament to make the offence a non-cognizable and bailable one. It is been a duty of the court to condemn wrongdoings and protect the victim but what happens when the victim turns into the abuser?

What remedy does the husband have here? On this ground, the woman gets to divorce her husband and re-marry or even gain money in the form of compensation. But what this would do is that it would give a fair chance to the man and above all help meet the ends of justice.

When women accuse their husbands under S. Therefore, the lawmakers must suggest some way of making this section non-biased to any individual such that the guilty is punished and the person wronged is given justice.

The position of the women in India is still bad. The educated woman of today must agree with the mantra of equality and demand the same but the trend is slowly getting reversed.

Recent Judgements: Indian Courts in their recent judgements have looked into the matter of misuse of Sec. As this Section provides that when an F. In their judicial observations and remarks, the courts have expressed deep anguish over this law. Here are some recent judicial observations. The acts attributed to such persons have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt and they cannot be held responsible by mere conjectures and implications.

Hoshan vs.

State of A. The impact of complaints, accusation or taunts on a person amounting to cruelty depends on various factors like the sensitivity of the victim concerned, the social background, the environment, education etc.

Further, mental cruelty varies from person to person depending on the intensity of the sensitivity, degree of courage and endurance to withstand such cruelty. But as has been rightly contented by the petitioner that many instances have come to light where the complaints are not bonafide and have been filed with oblique motive.

In such cases acquittal of the accused does not in all cases wipe out the ignominy suffered during and prior to trial. Sometimes adverse media coverage adds to the misery. The question, therefore, is what remedial measures can be taken to prevent abuse of the well-intentioned provision. Merely because the provision is constitutional and intra vires, does not give a licence to unscrupulous persons to wreck personal vendetta or unleash harassment.

Sections in IPC (576 total)

It may, therefore, become necessary for the legislature to find out ways how the makers of frivolous complaints or allegations can be appropriately dealt with. Till then the Courts have to take care of the situation within the existing frame work.

But by misuse of the provision a new legal terrorism can be unleashed. There is no question of investigating agency and Courts casually dealing with the allegations. They cannot follow any straitjacket formula in the matters relating to dowry tortures, deaths and cruelty. It cannot be lost sight of that ultimate objective of every legal system is to arrive at truth, punish the guilty and protect the innocent.

There is no scope for any pre-conceived notion or view.

It is strenuously argued by the petitioner that the investigating agencies and the courts start with the presumptions that the accused persons are guilty and that the complainant is speaking the truth. This is too wide available and generalized statement.

Certain statutory presumptions are drawn which again are rebuttable. It is to be noted that the role of the investigating agencies and the courts is that of watch dog and not of a bloodhound.

It should be their effort to see that an innocent person is not made to suffer on account of unfounded, baseless and malicious allegations. It is equally undisputable that in many cases no direct evidence is available and the courts have to act on circumstantial evidence. While dealing with such cases, the law laid down relating to circumstantial evidence has to be kept in view.

Looking into the recent observations and the increase in the misuse of this Section, there should be certain amendments which should be brought up in this law: 1. They should not encourage any woman to file a criminal case against her in-laws for trivial matters. If these organizations are found to be assisting in filing false complaints, then they should be made liable for prosecution in the country where they are functioning.

As of now there is no organization, which can really help these harassed men and his family members, to listen their side of the story and put their point of view in front of the government.

Need of the hour is to create family counseling centers across the country to help those aggrieved families.

Time bound Investigation and Trial: A speedy trial of a cases will not only ensure justice for the innocents that have been implicated in false charges, it will also lead to prompt redressal of the grievances of real dowry victims.

The reduction in false cases will also reduce the burden on judiciary and expedite the processing of real cases. Definition of Mental Cruelty: Mental cruelty has been vaguely defined in the act, which leaves scope of misuse.

This should be clearly elaborated to remove loopholes in the law. There should be provision for men also to file a case for mental cruelty by his wife. The government should create awareness among officers about its misuse.

IPC 354C: Section 354C of the Indian Penal Code

Bailable: The main reason of a being misused to harass innocent is its non-bailable nature. This section should be made bailable to prevent innocent old parents, pregnant sisters, and school going children from languishing in custody for weeks without any fault of them. Compoundable: Once FIR has been registered it becomes impossible to withdraw the case even if wife realizes that she has done a blunder and wants to come back to her matrimonial home.

It was also argued that adultery law gave a license to women to commit the crime. It held that Section did not give a license to women to commit adultery.

The judgment said that making a special provision for women to escape culpability was constitutionally valid under Article 15 3 that allows such a law. Moreover, in an interesting observation, the Supreme Court said in the judgment that "it is commonly accepted that it is the man who is the seducer, and not the woman.

However, despite declaring women as "victim only" in the occurrence of the crime of adultery, the court did not allow them to file a complaint. In Sowmithri Vishnu case, the Supreme Court held that women need not be included as an aggrieved party in the name of making the law even handed. It also explained as to why women should not be involved in prosecution in the cases of adultery.

The Supreme Court held that men were not allowed to prosecute their wives for the offence of adultery in order to protect the sanctity of marriage. For the same reason, women could not be allowed to prosecute their husbands.

The judgment retained the offence of adultery as a crime committed by a man against another man. The Supreme Court also rejected the argument that unmarried women should be brought under the purview of the adultery law. The argument was that if an unmarried man establishes adulterous relationship with a married woman, he is liable for punishment, but if an unmarried woman engages in a sexual intercourse with a married man, she would not be held culpable for the offence of adultery, even though both disturb the sanctity of marriage.

The Supreme Court held that bringing such an unmarried woman in the ambit of adultery law under Section would mean a crusade by a woman against another woman.

The ambiguity related to adultery law remained unresolved.

Section 498 IPC

It offered the couple a chance to "make up" and keep the sanctity of marriage intact. The Supreme Court observed that adultery law was a "shield rather than a sword". The court ruled that the existing adultery law did not infringe upon any constitutional provision by restricting the ambit of Section to men.Section 3.

Get to Know Us. It is to be noted that the role of the investigating agencies and the courts is that of watch dog and not of a bloodhound. Supreme Court Weekly Round Up. This law will be yet another weapon in the hands of unscrupulous women who will misuse it at the slightest opportunity.

Sexual offences: as per section to of IPC talks about sexual offences as per Conclusion: Anyone who has been awake the last two decades knows how section A of IPC has been heavily misused, dragging innocent men and women into police stations, lock-ups and courts, thus depriving may young children of a happy childhood, many youth of productive careers and many senior citizens of mental peace in the last leg of their lives.

NICKOLE from Montana
I relish angrily . Review my other posts. I take pleasure in woodball.