myavr.info Laws Ken Follett Century Trilogy Ebook

KEN FOLLETT CENTURY TRILOGY EBOOK

Saturday, August 24, 2019


Editorial Reviews. myavr.info Review. Amazon Best of the Month, September Welcome to the 20th century as you've never seen it. At over 1, pages, . Ken Follett's extraordinary historical epic, the Century Trilogy, reaches its sweeping, passionate conclusion. In Fall of Giants and Winter of the World, Ken Follett. Results 1 - 12 of 55 Search results for ""ken follett"" at Rakuten Kobo. Read free Edge of Eternity - Book Three of The Century Trilogy ebook by Ken Follett.


Author:ELENI PINNOW
Language:English, Spanish, French
Country:Argentina
Genre:Children & Youth
Pages:757
Published (Last):12.12.2015
ISBN:608-5-22530-641-6
ePub File Size:16.35 MB
PDF File Size:13.21 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Regsitration Required]
Downloads:44202
Uploaded by: CARROLL

The Century Trilogy has 16 entries in the series. Edge of Eternity Deluxe Edition. The Century Trilogy (Series). Ken Follett Author (). cover image of Fall of. Fall of Giants: Book One of the Century Trilogy (The Century Trilogy series) by Ken Follett. Read online, or download in secure EPUB format. I'm looking to read my first Ken Follett book and I'm torn between Fall of Giants and Pillars of the Earth. Any suggestions on which one I should read first? I know .

There isn't a very high bar for this kind of book. Johnson appear as Dostoyevsky. Instead, there are at least 2, more pages of inanities to come. The historical realities dictate everything that happens in this novel.

You will find more drama, however, on any Wikipedia page. It would be a stretch to call these characters archetypes. There is no wit, warmth, or ingenuity to be found. The only surprise is that Follett does exactly what you expect him to, every single time. Against suffrage. Sleeping with his maid. But this is Follett. He does it. And if you also surmised that this German man will be suspiciously anti-imperial no spiked helmet or pointy mustache here!

Or what about the Williams family? As though there is a difference. It is the extent of the use of any idioms, really. Every character, whether English or Welsh or Russian or American or German speaks in the exact same way: unconvincingly.

That is, they converse in robotic monotones meant to deliver historical exposition to keep us moving down the timeline toward the sequel. There is never a moment when two characters share original thoughts, insights, or profundities.

He mixes all these into 1, pages and creates a bestseller. Ken Follett has entered into a dark pact. To be fair, Fall of Giants does not aspire to be great, National Book Award-contending literary fiction. There isn't a very high bar for this kind of book. Johnson appear as Dostoyevsky. Instead, there are at least 2, more pages of inanities to come. The historical realities dictate everything that happens in this novel.

You might also like: CARP FISHING EBOOK

You will find more drama, however, on any Wikipedia page. It would be a stretch to call these characters archetypes. There is no wit, warmth, or ingenuity to be found. The only surprise is that Follett does exactly what you expect him to, every single time. Against suffrage. Sleeping with his maid. But this is Follett. He does it.

And if you also surmised that this German man will be suspiciously anti-imperial no spiked helmet or pointy mustache here! Or what about the Williams family? As though there is a difference. It is the extent of the use of any idioms, really.

I think through combining these perspectives we get a strong admission for what the world was like during world war one. Moreover, the characters themselves are incredibly interesting people.

Their lives are not exactly remarkable, but I think the way Follet writes captures something that many authors fail to do.

It may be because they are realistic; thus, they can be related to very easily. They feel like the kind of person that would have existed at the time, and the problems they face reflect the age in which they lived. Indeed, the book covers social issues such as inequality of women and racism, mostly toward Jews. This again enhances a reading experience that is true to the age.

A neutral judgement of the war I especially like the way the book is told from a neutral sense. The Germans are not blamed for the war, by the author, as they were at the time by other nations. Follet hints at what could have happened during the war if the Germans made different decisions. The English too, and the French, could have quite easily made some war avoiding decisions.

The Austrians had attacked Serbia when they might have held back; the Russians had mobilized instead of negotiating; the Germans had refused to attend an international conference to settle the issue; the French had been offered the chance to remain neutral and had spurned it; and now the British were about to join in when they might easily have remained on the sidelines. The only reason I gave this book four stars, and not five, was that I personally prefer reading novels based upon ancient or medieval history.

A strong four stars View all 4 comments.

Jul 23, Denise rated it it was amazing. This is a fantastic epic, the first in a planned trilogy by the author of The Pillars of the Earth now a miniseries and World Without End.

I simply raced through the pages, unable to put this book down even though it was a hefty nearly pages. The story moves seamlessly and logically, starting in a 5. The story moves seamlessly and logically, starting in and ending in , and has a large cast of characters -- all so beautifully developed that the reader comes to care about each one -- the good and the bad. There are Lords and Ladies, Dukes and Duchesses, Kings, Queens, Earls, Dukes -- even the servants, miners, and other assorted people populate this work of fiction.

The author has also inserted real historical figures into the story, and their interaction with Follett's characters is very well done. From a mining town in Aberowen, South Wales, to the drawing rooms of the privileged aristocracy in Russia, Britain, Germany, and to the War Room in the White House of Woodrow Wilson -- the narrative captivates as it tells the tale of the people involved in the conflict and their lives during this period of change in the world.

The story is intriguing and complex, but eminently readable. The violence and gore that were present in Follett's previous works is absent here, and the action is fast and the storytelling fantastic. I have a fondness for historical fiction, and this work does not disappoint as the author has obviously thoroughly researched the era and has rendered it beautifully. I won't and can't provide a synopsis of this book other than to say that it's a drama about life and love during these fateful years and I promise you that this will go down as being one of the best books you've ever read.

I cannot recommend it highly enough and can't wait for the sequel! Historical fiction at its best. View all 13 comments. Aug 26, Dem rated it it was amazing Shelves: At pages, Fall of the Giants is a massive tome and the first book in The Century Trilogy, follows the fates of five interrelated families—American, German, Russian, English, and Welsh—as they move through the world-shaking dramas of the First World War, the Russian Revolution, and the struggle for women's suffrage.

These characters find their lives inextricably entangled in a saga of unfolding drama and intriguing complexity, Fall of Giants moves seamlessly from Washington to St. Petersburg, At pages, Fall of the Giants is a massive tome and the first book in The Century Trilogy, follows the fates of five interrelated families—American, German, Russian, English, and Welsh—as they move through the world-shaking dramas of the First World War, the Russian Revolution, and the struggle for women's suffrage.

Petersburg, from the dirt and danger of the coal mines to the glittering chandeliers of a palace, from the corridors of power to the bedrooms of the mighty.

As with all Ken Follett novels the characters and historical events are extremely well researched. I love his attention to detail. I really enjoyed following the lives of all the families involved as well as reading the dramatic historical events at the beginning of the 20th Century. I love books that can incorporate history with fiction and not make the reader feel bogged down with facts but yet you come away with a little more knowledge than you started with.

Fall of Giants is a big read and I started the novel by listening to it as an audio book but switched in favour of a paperback.

For me this was a great historical read and I am really looking forward to Part Two of this trilogy. Definitely my favourite WWI history novel I have read thus far. Beautifully captures the troubles of WWI on all spectrums, not just politically or on the battlefield. Jun 05, Lavonne rated it liked it Shelves: I have loved just about everything Ken Follett has written, but I think this one fell short of his usual standard. Most of his novels grab you from the beginning, with fully-drawn characters and gripping plot lines.

I wasn't even done with the second chapter before I began to wonder if I was even going to like this. I think he may have tried to accomplish too much with this story. There were so many characters with so much going on in their lives. There was not enough time to give more than a gl I have loved just about everything Ken Follett has written, but I think this one fell short of his usual standard.

Customers who bought this item also bought

There was not enough time to give more than a glimpse of each character's personality and motives, even though the novel was almost a 1, pages long. I will grant that quite a lot of research had to have gone into it before the writing. However, the political details read more like a history book and made it very hard to dredge though. One part that did make me chuckle was when one of the characters had a chance to view a chapel that was built around AD.

He couldn't figure out why other people were so enchanted with old churches. Remembering "Pillars of the Earth", which might be argued as Follett's greatest novel, I think that was a little "tongue-in-cheek". This is the first book of a planned triology and I probably will read the others. I will wait until they come out in paperback, though. This novel didn't leave me breathlessly waiting for the next. View all 6 comments. View all 10 comments. Esta foi a minha estreia nos livros de Ken Follett.

E foi uma excelente estreia!

ken follett epub torrent

Adorei o tema, a escrita, os personagens Recomendo a leitura, sem duvida e espero ansiosamente a leitura d Esta foi a minha estreia nos livros de Ken Follett. View all 8 comments. Foi com tristeza que cheguei ao fim. Fall of Giants is a door stopper, one of those books that makes me glad I have an e-reader for the sake of my wrists.

At close to pages, it's long, and at times it feels like it.

The first time I tried to read it, I didn't have the patience, but this time, I settled in for the long haul, determined to give it some time. That patience made all the difference. This is an astounding historical epic.

It takes the events leading up to World War I and the Russian Revolution and fills them with ch Fall of Giants is a door stopper, one of those books that makes me glad I have an e-reader for the sake of my wrists.

It takes the events leading up to World War I and the Russian Revolution and fills them with characters on all sides that you can relate to and feel for.

I didn't like all of the characters, but I understood them and their motivations, and they were so real.

Follett paints them in neat brushstrokes - just a few lines here and there for each character that bring them to life. And then he proceeds to take you through the war and its aftermath through their eyes, through dashed hopes and picking up the pieces of lives.

It is surprisingly not bleak, and surprisingly spends little time on the actual battles of the war. Those are only the focus when they move something forward, when they are pivotal for a character or for the direction of the war. Even then, the focus is more on strategy or what is happening to the character than on the violence.

Not that you don't get a sense of that, too, but it's not a battle slog. I really appreciated that it didn't get bogged down in the trenches, dwelling on the horror and slaughter. Instead, it stepped back and looked at the reasons why people did what they did, and how the world got into such a mess and then couldn't get back out. It's been a while since I learned about the Great War in school, so this was a fantastic way to refresh my memory - and to realize with my more adult understanding that there was good and bad on all sides, humans exploiting others and grasping for power, and other humans just trying to find a way to live in peace.

If anyone was bad in this take on history, it was the upper classes, not restricted to any nation - although Russia got the worst of it. It was the elite who dragged the poor working people into the war, who oppressed them and allowed them to starve while they continued living in style. It was the elite men who didn't want working women to have the right to vote, etc. So this addresses social issues such as class and women's rights, and just briefly, race.

And it does it in such a readable way. There were only a couple of times that I felt it was slow, and that was when the focus was on characters that I wasn't so interested in. I'm amazed at how easy it seems for Follett to bring all of these strings of sweeping historical and social change together in real people that you fear for, and make it understandable as well as engrossing.

It is magnificent and deeply personal at the same time. Highly recommended to anyone who reads historical fiction and is in the mood for a rewarding epic. I gave this a decent try, but just couldn't get into it. I really enjoyed the The Pillars of the Earth - it was one of the first historical fiction novels that I discovered and loved - but I felt more connected to the characters and their challenges, not to mention the epic cathedral project, from the beginning.

This one is more 'sweeping' as it has been described. For me, that's not necessarily a good thing. The difference of time period may also be a factor - I enjoy reading about the Medieval Era, but have never really been able to get into books about the 20th Century wars. Pillars was centered around a priory town with lots of political intrigue and the building of a cathedral cool architectural stuff!

Since that initial experience, I've discovered by trial and error that not all historical fiction is for me it turns out I'm picky , and I think this is simply another mismatch for me.

Whatever the reason, I put it on hold when I was tired of trying so hard to like it, and never felt compelled to come back to it. I suppose that could still change, but for now I'm happy to leave it where it is.

The Century trilogy by Ken Follett (Book Analysis)

Normally I can rate a book pretty quickly, without giving much thought to it, but this one, was difficult. I'm fairly neutral with how I feel about this book. I've definitely read worse, but then I've read better as well. This has been hailed as a masterpiece.

This is no masterpiece and in my experience, it quickly became a headache. There are some aspects of the book that I did like, though. I liked the fact that the characters Maud and Ethel were from very different backgrounds but were both c Normally I can rate a book pretty quickly, without giving much thought to it, but this one, was difficult. I liked the fact that the characters Maud and Ethel were from very different backgrounds but were both confidently fighting for women's rights.

I'm going to say that though, as I'm a feminist. I feel their characters themselves were not as developed as I would have liked though. I appreciate the amount of research that has gone into the writing of this book, especially when one is talking about the war itself. My problem is, that the majority of the second half of the book was eaten away by these battle scenes, and that quickly became tedious for me. I usually enjoy historical fiction based on war but this was too much and the main plot kind of got lost in it.

Despite this book being nearly pages long I do think Ken Follett tried to accomplish way too much in this book.

News Center

We are introduced to a vast array of characters with stories to tell but we only get half of these stories and glimpses of their lives, which made me feel so much less for those characters, as I felt I couldn't relate to them.

I feel that the writing was simple and phrases were definitely overused. If I read the term "After they made love" once more, I'll scream! Seriously, throwing that phrase in there in every chapter major things dreadfully cumbersome. This book was certainly readable but it dragged too much for me to really enjoy it. View 1 comment. Mar 13, Adam rated it it was ok Shelves: I love Ken Follett.

Seriously, has a better epic period novel been written than Pillars of the Earth? I even like his other more basic stuff like Whiteout and A Dangerous Fortune.

Sure they are simple beach novels but they are good reads. Fall of Giants seems like it can't decide if it wants to be the beach novel or the epic period novel. So the result is flat characters, a listless storyline, and rocket paced love affairs. Jus Meh. Just the romantic interests It is strange to say, but the backdrop of World War I is so trivialized that it is almost casual.

Follett managed to bring significantly more pathos and emotion to the building of a Cathedral than the battles of Russia, Germany, England, Austria, and the US combined.

Don't get me wrong, his effort here is no less sweeping and dramatic than Pillars, it just falls woefully short of making me care about any of the characters. I'm still surprised he managed to say so little in pages. Mar 23, Shannon rated it really liked it Shelves: The first of a promised trilogy. Focus is on the early s detailing a vast array of characters affected by the coming Great War WWI which helps along the process of women's suffrage, trade unions, topples nobility and the rise of the Bolsheviks in Mother Russia.

WWI focus is less on the battles and more on the suffering. The very end of this page tale shows the aftermath of the war and the ominous foreboding of another World War to come. Woodrow Wilson was the first president t The first of a promised trilogy. Woodrow Wilson was the first president to leave the U. September to November My teens was when I first and I think last read Ken Follett. I wasn't really impressed then with his books, despite those books being touted as some of his best works ever.

Well, goes to show how different individual liking can be. So, when I chose to read this book, it was more for the subject than the author, although I had heard a lot of good things about the way the author had written the book etc. Nevertheless, I was sceptical and wasn't really expecting anything better than an average read My teens was when I first and I think last read Ken Follett. Nevertheless, I was sceptical and wasn't really expecting anything better than an average read, which I thought would take me a long time to finish, given that I a naturally disposed towards other shinier books all the time!

However, I was in for a surprise. Not only did I finish the book quickly at least according to me it was quick but it was a page turner and non put-downable book okay that phrase is mine and not correct English but believe me, it is worth that tag!

Ken Follett, through the lives of five families, recounts some of the world's most important historic moments and what's more is that he does it with a certain panache and pace that is definitely worth praises.

Nowhere are you left wondering what happened to X character or Y character. What is even better is that he incorporates real life historical figures into the storyline with aplomb and it never feels artificial or contrived. I loved the plot building and character building in this book. What I loved most was the fact that the two were intertwined with each other and supported each other really beautifully.

The events led to the casual growth of the characters and the characters growth led to the events and the two did meet beautifully. Another aspect that I loved of this author in this book is his presentation of his characters. Each of them have shades that are unique and nowhere does the author force you to think of them as good or bad. In fact, he leaves all the judging to you and allows himself the freedom to develop them in a way that perhaps speaks to him whilst also speaking to us.

I loved and hated and then loved all the characters through their journey, such was their impact on me. Nowhere did I continue to feel the same way for any character, except perhaps Billy and Grigori, both of whom I was rooting for throughout the book.

The beauty of the characters created by Ken Follett is such that even when they are doing something wrong, they do it with such a style that you end up admiring them for that rather than hating them. One such character is Lev who I feel is the best and the worst character one you love and hate and hate that you love in this book. A few discussions regarding the book in the past brought to my notice that some of the historical facts stated here in the book were either wrong or somewhat exaggerated.

While it did bother me a little in the beginning, given the fact that the author has done more than 20 years of research and consulting experts in all fields before penning this book; I would like to say that it didn't take away from me the enjoyment given by this book while I read it.

I think it was fun and while moving along with the characters in their lives, I was more caught up in their fictional tales rather than the historical aspect. This meant that I enjoyed it so much that I was reluctant to take away even a single star from my rating. However, if you are a history buff and are well versed in the World War scenarios, some of it might irritate you, I am not sure. In such cases, I guess you need to read it as a fictional tale set in that historical period and just let go of the historical accuracies or inaccuracies, if any.

For myself, I am not well learned or read in the matters of that period, so I took everything that came my way as the truth or as much truth as it can be and enjoyed the story. If you are willing to enjoy a good tale, with some real and imagined characters, set in the backdrop of one of the world's most important times, please go ahead and read it.

I assure you, you won't be disappointed. Finishing the book last night, I felt akin to losing a part of myself and that to me is the best thing a book can do. I was so engrossed in it that I forgot everything else, except maybe periodically updating my progress here in GR. Once I put it down after it ended, I wanted to rush and start the next book in the series and believe me I almost did that.

However, sanity prevailed and I stopped myself While I do that and also look forward to reading the next book, why don't you give this one a try? Rest assured that you will be entertained! Happy reading! De forma vertiginosa saltamos de um ambiente para outro.

Deflagra o absurdo da guerra! Homens exauridos, famintos. View 2 comments. Jun 27, Renata rated it it was amazing Shelves: Ken Follett is a spellbinding storyteller. You can count on him to create a complex plot around an almost dizzying array of characters with a vast range of character traits from scoundrels to nobly inspiring as well as throwing in real historical figures.

I listened to his Century Trilogy last year and was thoroughly caught up in both the history and the often times soap opera of the many characters lives. I never really count listening to audio books as reading, but I probably need to revise my Ken Follett is a spellbinding storyteller. I never really count listening to audio books as reading, but I probably need to revise my perspective on that as I am listening to almost as many books as I read.

The first book in the series is my favorite for several reasons. Most importantly I enjoyed it because Follett did an exceptionally fine job of portraying in some detail the political climate in England, Germany, Russia, and to a lesser extent the United States in the years leading up to WWII.

He did this quite artfully by giving voice to an array of characters from different social levels as well as nationalities. I could feel my blood pressure rise during their debates and verbal exchanges. Prior to this my knowledge and understanding of the period leading up to WWII was a sketchy skeleton of key words: It has also remained my favorite in the series because I thoroughly enjoyed the various groups of characters he introduced - the Welsh coal mining family was one of my favorites.

The stories were also enriched because Follett showed how different the thinking and perspectives were across generations. Later in on series I grew quite tired of some of the characters and some of the plot contrivances made me roll my eyes in exasperation.

But now I laugh and think what an impressive job he did in creating a compelling pageant of those war years with a focus on the social as much as the political upheavals. He allowed us walk in the shoes of many men and women throughout Europe and America - he created a world perspective. View all 14 comments.

This first novel in the Century trilogy is truly excellent, and it lays a magnificent foundation for what I hope are equally impressive parts two and three. There is striking development in all the major characters as they move through two decades in the early twentieth century. Follett meshes his skills as a thriller writer with his even greater talents in historical fiction, so that this massive book, with its interrelating families from America, Britain, Germany, and Russia, is much like a pa This first novel in the Century trilogy is truly excellent, and it lays a magnificent foundation for what I hope are equally impressive parts two and three.

Follett meshes his skills as a thriller writer with his even greater talents in historical fiction, so that this massive book, with its interrelating families from America, Britain, Germany, and Russia, is much like a page-turning thriller in its own right.

The book fleshed out a lot of history for me, including events leading to World War I and the Russian Revolution. While Follett has an afterword explaining his historical approach as building on either absolute fact, or what might have happened within the bounds of actual history, the level of trust Follett builds with the reader means that you instinctively know that you have real history in front of you as you move through the novel.

I listened to the audiobook version, narrated by John Lee, who magnificently brought out numerous accents, including different kinds of Welsh accents.

Es war einfach genial wie er es geschafft hat Geschichte einem so nahe zu bringen. Dabei fand ich es besonders herausstechend wie nahe mir die Protagonisten gekommen sind und wie betroffen mich ihr Schicksal machte.

Dec 30, Rohit Enghakat rated it it was amazing Shelves: Simply stupendous and engaging! This is a sweeping historical saga from to covering principally, the World War I. The myriad characters mingled with the historical events was so interesting that it keeps you hooked.Against suffrage.

This one I got into immediately. The events led to the casual growth of the characters and the characters growth led to the events and the two did meet beautifully.

Obviously not everything is neutral Here begin our issues. Unavailable for purchase. To cover so many years in any decent amount of depth was a great challenge, to which Follett rises well.

MARLANA from Florida
Review my other articles. I have a variety of hobbies, like western pleasure. I do fancy reading novels deeply .