JULIAN ASSANGE THE UNAUTHORISED AUTOBIOGRAPHY PDF
Julian Assange The Unauthorised Autobiography, Canongate, Great Britain. Price: £ PDF download for Julian Assange (). Julian. Julian Assange: The Unauthorised Autobiography. Home · Julian Assange: The Unauthorised Julian Assange - WikiLeaks Warrior for Truth · Read more. Released by his publishers without consent, Julian Assange's autobiography The Unauthorised Autobiography by Canongate delivers no new facts, but the.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Portuguese|
|ePub File Size:||29.40 MB|
|PDF File Size:||9.33 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
Julian Assange - The Unauthorised Autobiography [Julian Assange] on Amazon. com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In December , Julian Assange. Assange Julian. The Unauthorised Autobiography. Файл формата pdf; размером 1,46 МБ. Добавлен пользователем igor_tomilin julian assange the unauthorised autobiography Taylor, B S Engine Specs, Precalculus Stewart 6th Edition Solutions Manual Pdf, Honda Sabre Owners.
Assange denied the allegations and said he was happy to face questions in Britain. The Swedish prosecutor wrote to the English Crown Prosecution Service CPS in advising it that she intended lifting the detention order and withdrawing the European arrest warrant as the actions were not proportionate to the costs and seriousness of the crime.
In response the CPS tried to dissuade the Swedish prosecutor from doing so. Since the Swedish prosecutor had not interviewed Assange by 18 August , the questioning pertained only to the open investigation of "lesser degree rape", whose statute of limitations is due to expire in Chief prosecutor Marianne Ny officially revoked his arrest warrant, but said the investigation could still be resumed if Assange visited Sweden before August On 8 December Assange gave himself up to British police and attended his first extradition hearing where he was remanded in custody pending another hearing.
A further hearing on the 24 February ruled that Assange should be extradited to Sweden.
Officers of the Metropolitan Police Service were stationed outside the building from June to October in order to arrest Assange for breaching the bail conditions and to compel him to attend court to face the extradition appeal hearing, should he leave the embassy. The police guard was withdrawn on grounds of cost in October , but the police said they would still deploy "a number of overt and covert tactics to arrest him". The Australian attorney-general at the time, Nicola Roxon , had written a letter to Assange's legal representative, Jennifer Robinson , in which she wrote that Australia would not seek to involve itself in any international exchanges about Assange's future.
She also wrote that "should Mr. Assange be convicted of any offence in the United States and a sentence of imprisonment imposed, he may apply for an international prisoner transfer to Australia". Only if I died would I accept that. Jamie: With my Canongate hat on I thought we were going to cancel the deal, get the money and work out a new contract. Julian: I did warn you that you needed to carefully construct the letter. Jamie: It is clear from talking to Caroline that there is no letter in the world that would get that money back.
Jamie: This would all be academic if we had a book to go to the other publishers with. Julian: It may be academic for you, but its not for me.
They still have my money. You might get half of it back or something. Jamie: I was always committed to doing a book with you and paying advance on earnings. What I want Andy to do with you and I is to work out what is this book and when can it be published, when do we think collectively would be the best time to publish.
Jamie: I have not spoken to him. My desire, the only way forward I see is to come up with a book that is along the lines we discussed. Julian: I agree. Jamie: So, right now, lets not do anything.
What I want Andy to do in the next week or so is come up with a proposal and that we can all look at: you, Sonny and I and we can all agree we would sign off on. When we sign off on it….? Sonny is over in early July. Julian: Early July is rather difficult for me. Jamie: Do not worry. Andy should lie out his vision for this book and we can all look.
It could result in a great book and do all the things you wanted this book to do, perhaps more as it is objective. I think all our instincts that this is the book to publish are right and lets not try to do anything this week or next week on that.
I will talk to Andy about starting this work up. Julian: Tomorrow night might be a good time to do that due to the Grand Jury and house arrest video as then it shows the whole world is crashing down on Julian.
Jamie: What I propose we do is get a draft press release to you. Complications with my three kids and an unwell mother. But I am in London on Monday and Tuesday. Would love to see Julian even very briefly.
Send him my best. It looks like it is going to be a lovely day. Sorry to rush off without saying goodbye. I need to fix a meeting between Julian and Jamie some time in early September. Could we look at some dates? Meanwhile could you pass this note onto Julian?
Dear Julian So good to see you yesterday. In spite of all the pressures, you look very well. I am not suggesting he writes anything only that he works with you.
He is an expert in this as well as being a novelist. I have sent Jamie a note to say you are going to meet with him and a text to Andy saying you are going to call him. I cannot see a downside in delivering a book with your message and your story. It was fascinating sitting and listening to you yesterday talking about your story. Financially was we discussed once Jamie and Sonny know the book is back on track we can discuss a new payment schedule but they will need considerable assurances that the book will be delivered to them to publish.
I will try and find a tax financier for you to talk to who is cognizant of all the concerns around you before any more money is delivered. Mr Assange is the owner of the copy right in the draft manuscript, whether it was written by him or his collaborator. It is an infringement to copy the work or issue copies to public section 17 and 18 of the Act. On the basis that you are prepared to agree to the above conditions, Mr Assange will ensure that the publication of his autobiography will be supported by the WikiLeaks worldwide network, rather than be publicly opposed to, as would be the case if publication takes place in the form you currently propose.
We would request a response to the above proposal by 5pm 13 September Whilst our client and Mr Assange would hope that they can reach agreement with you to resolve this matter, failing such agreement, our client and Mr Assange rights are fully reserved. It surely has to be counter productive to go to war with Julian in this way. I've been hesitant to post some of this in case it's upsetting or annoying to a couple of friends that's not about offendness as an abstract concept, it's about possibly upsetting people I like and wouldn't want to upset and it's a subject I wouldn't have started talking to them about directly.
People nowadays love the play of selfhood: Even if a separation from the organisation one creaed would be a great loss in a life of workaholism and few personal attachments, and took a while to adjust to, it might be the ethical thing to do. Although one suspects he still brings useful financial benefits to the organisation via celebrity contacts and funders.
I was already about halfway through this book when the latest headlines appeared about Assange possibly, finally being questioned - the timing in reading the book, from that point of view, was coincidental. The timing was probably, actually because O'Hagan's novel was longlisted for the Booker My subconscious has a thing about Assange - and stupidly, it also still thinks he looks like this.
It's more like a bit of OCD than a crush: I can say I don't fancy him and feel entirely honest; and he looks outright [appropriately? Whilst I'd hardly read about Assange for ages, the O'Hagan longlisting seems to have sparked dreams. I've had, or remembered, more asleep-dreams about him than about any other famous person. Analytically, I can work out why: I've no illusion he'd be good company, or cares much about people around him, it's just Because I want to keep trying to debunk this mind-tic, without going for reactive bias one way or another, I want to find an academically rigorous and neutral analysis of Assange's and Wikileaks' activities.
I bought this ebook idly because it was cheap in a sale. Something else, by someone else, would have been closer to the study I was looking for if it exists yet. This post covers little of the politics - but that's because most of that was material I'd seen so many times in old news it was commonplace. View all 5 comments. Oct 31, Santosh rated it it was amazing.
Every person in this world is capable enough to leave his mark on this world. What kind of mark to be left is to be decided by the person himself.
Many people don't decide so they leave a mark which no one notices. Few decide, and leave a strong mark, which will be noticed by many. But there are few who are so clear on what to do with their life and follow their gut feeling and are so truthful, that the mark they leave is noticed by everyone.
And it will change the very life of each and every on Every person in this world is capable enough to leave his mark on this world. And it will change the very life of each and every one of us. The world in which we are going to live in, will be changed world and a better world. This changed and better world will be very much because of the people who come under third catagory.
While reading this Autobiography, I came across ideas of being a true reporter.
Julian Assange - The Unauthorised Autobiography
How transperancy between the people who run a country and the countrymen should be. Life of a good person who takes the path of truth is not easy. Most of the time he might be alone. This is the time when one should rethink of his principle and stand for what he is.
And most of his life Julian Assanage has done it and still doing it. I think this man is most gutsy person I have ever known. A well written book of an extraordinary man with simple principle of truth and enormous courage. View 2 comments. Apr 13, Owlseyes marked it as to-read Shelves: Sep 27, Sudheer Madhava rated it it was amazing.
Personally, this is one of the few books which will influence me for life. My sense of justice, freedom and human values perceptibly shifted as I went through this first person narrative. What makes it appealing in spite of some technical jargon and predictably self justifying statements of a person in distress is Julian Assange's intent of using his amazing ability with technology to attempt to make the truth known to humanity.
The truth as it is and not the truth churned out by a conventional Personally, this is one of the few books which will influence me for life. The truth as it is and not the truth churned out by a conventional media blinded by political and corporate power. I am sure that as we look back at these times, this man will stand out as one of the few who had the ability, courange and most importantly the intent to attempt to change the world for the better.
View all 3 comments. Aug 12, James added it. A Thousand Plateaus is required reading for Assange fans and enemies, as well as those who don't give a fig but carry a Master or Visa card or just have a particular bent for Continental theory. According to Deleuze and Guattari Western thought is dominated by a structure of knowledge they call aboresence. This way of knowing is tree-like, vertical, and centralized. For instance, in biology, we have Linnean taxonomies.
In chemistry, we have Porphyrian trees. In linguistics we have Chomskyan se A Thousand Plateaus is required reading for Assange fans and enemies, as well as those who don't give a fig but carry a Master or Visa card or just have a particular bent for Continental theory.
In linguistics we have Chomskyan sentence trees. Did they say Western?
In China we have centralized, hierarchical government and Internet censorship. Such trees show up worldwide, not only in the fields of biology, botany, linguistics, and anatomy, but also in philosophy, where we find metaphysical trees, theological treess, gnostic trees, The World Tree. Such trees are hierarchical, imposing limited and regulated connections between their components.
All such trees spread out like many branches, stemming from a single trunk--each radiating out from an original oneness or unity. And don't forget Plato, who stands as the central trunk in Western thought--or his Ideal Forms: Doberman pinschers, German shepherds, collies, and poodles are all material manifestations of an immaterial Essence--an Ideal Form of what Plato might call Dogginess.
Dogginess is the single Platonic Origin--the Trunk--of the tree of dogs. Opposed to the vertical, tree-like structure of knowledge, Deleuze and Guattari proclaim a rhizomatic, radically horizontal, crabgrass-like way of knowing. Crabgrass, for instance, is a plant. But instead of having one central root, a rhizome such as crabgrass or the Internet has zillions of roots, none of which is central--and each offshoot interconnects in random, unregulated networks in which any node can interconnect with any other node.
Whereas the tree seeks to establish itself and say "I am," the rhizome is always rearranging interconnections, providing lines of flight, ranging nomadically saying "and, and, and.
The rhizome is concerned with surface connections, lines of flight, with the "and. One might expect a novel named The Trial to have something to do with the law. But Deleuze and G. Thus, Kafka's protagonist, K. Thus, Justice, like the courthouse and desire, is rhizomatic, never reaching conclusion. We will see how this plays out in the Assange case. The Internet, like a rhizome, is non-hierarchical, horizontal.
Its nodes intersect in random, unregulated networks in which any node can interconnect with any other node. Plateaus lays out the underlying grammar of our postmodern info-wars, which, as the example below shows, are all about power.
If info-activists and info-topians have a Bible, Deleuzean theory may be it, which many of these activists have swallowed hook-line and sinker as prescriptive rather than as descriptive of postmodern realities. Notice, in the example quoted below, the heterotopian vision coming from an avowed member of a loose confederation of thinkers who claim to have disavowed metanarratives.
One must not forget, however, that although rhizomes are a trend, trees are not obsolete. The human nervous system is one such tree. If it operated like a rhizome, it would be operating without a brain. Deleuze committed suicide by jumping from atop a tall, vertical structure--a building. We will someday see if Assange has been flirting with a legal system that is rhizomatic or vertical.
So far he is folling in K's footsteps--to a t. A central theme of Deleuzean anti-centrists is the deconstruction of the Oedipal myth, which involves exploding the central image of the father into many, and thus distributing anti-authoritarian ire towards an array of other targets.
For instance, in Kafka's "Letter to His Father," he inflates his father to laughably absurd, dreamlike dimensions, until his father's singular Fatherness ballons so huge that it pops--exploding into a vast rhizomatic network of father-like social connections represented by judges, commissioners, bureaucrats. Sound familiar? The following is an example of the info-topian mind-set, of strictly orthodox rhizomism, in which the author hearalds a major victory in the ifo-wars: Assange and the whole Wikileaks phenomenon is so important that it needs a little theory.
As of December they have been releasing huge numbers of cables relating to US foreign policy, which has the First World, especially the US State Department in a panic. In addition, other undisclosed information, such as revealing transfers of weapons technology from North Korea to Iran, US drug companies targeting African politicians, and so on. Infopower has begun to become autonomous of its material atomic roots. Instead of the robots, it is merely the infosphere that is asserting itself.
As such, it is focusing of society on this flow of capital which has relocated the foundations of power in the new millennium. In such a case, one node can be destroyed, and the network can still function despite their loss. Although the functionaries of conventional power have restructured themselves in terms of the informational milieu, the latter is not necessarily congruent with the former.
The Internet spans most physical states, yet resides in no single one. This deterritiorialization of the Infostate creates an asymmetrical power relation which, due to its amorphous nature, is problematic for the conventional nation-state to engage.
Conventional power requires a face upon which to focus fear and hatred upon, such as Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden.
Julian Assange: The Unauthorised Autobiography
This relationship signals the new balance of power between the nation-state and the Infostate as Krokerian Panic dialectic, in which the ability of the one to relate in terms of the other implodes.
As Deleuze, then Agamben assert that power is the separation of the subject from potentiality, and as such mitigates dissent, the nation-state is trying to exert power by separating the means of support and the figurehead from Wikileaks, but distributed, asymmetrical cyberwarfare by the net.
The Net, as child of the military conventional power has begun to turn on its masters, with expected reflexive responses. Although the previous statement says decentralized physical power, this is merely an intermediary step to the development of asymmetrical distributed infopower. The centralized, hierarchical nature of the material corporate nation-state has been unable to contain the decentralized flow of cellular power, which has become infopower, created by the emergency of distributed networks.
Conventional power now has a cloud of moving, replicating targets rather than one to aim at. It is like trying to hold mercury, because as the Critical Art Ensemble states, decentralized dissent can only be addressed through decentralized means, and this is not the structure of conventional power.
The real interventionists, CAE states, are the something year-old hackers who punch through the firewalls and reroute flows of information, creating irruptions of redirection, disruption, and detournement of infocapital at will.
This would be to contain the rise of informatic power by containing its means of distribution. This would be by the means of national firewalling, and trunk-line disconnection or limited Internet disabling, disrupting infopower, but also crippling the flow of digitized material capital as well.
This is problematic at best, as conventional power and informatic power are in symbiotic, the latter being more nimble and a step ahead of the former, and to attack a symbiote always means to cripple its partner as well. The logical result of such actions would be the elimination of net neutrality the free and open flow of data across the Internet or even the severance of typologies and flows of information across the networks.
It is for this reason that it cannot engage in this means of retaliation, as it would be the digital suicide of the First World nation-state. In this case, bits trump atoms in the milieu of the Net. I nation of nuclear gophers, lifeless in their burrows. It suggests that decentralized power renders hierarchical conventional power impotent, signaling the beginning of the 21st Century paradigm.
What would replace it is the creation of a cybernetic proto-industrial model of networked communes with high tech microproduction that would be established during and after a mass armed insurrection. There is another view on this. The insurrection, as CAE states, will not be with guns, but with bytes. Anarchy in its most powerful form is now in the disruption and release of data withheld by the nation-state.
You can find the answer just by gazing up at the clouds. The lizard part of your brain will instantly begin searching for--and finding--familiar forms within those billowing canvasses.
It's the same centric anxiety reflex that causes humans to look for leaders: Iguana babes may rally around such ass-kicking males, who in turn may be no match for a virus. Centrism and rhizome-ism are both embedded in nature.
It's their interplay that helps drive evolution--and thickens the plot. On rhizomatic strategic culture, as opposed to our Indo-European model of strategic culture: Feb 20, Mat rated it really liked it. This book deserves to sell far more than the few copies it has reportedly sold. The publisher has probably done the book a disservice by calling it "The Unauthorised Assange's story is vivid and deserves to be read if only to give his side to a story that many others have cashed in on, smearing him in the process.
Here are a few stand-out quotes: Big Brother is home. He is installed in This book deserves to sell far more than the few copies it has reportedly sold. He is installed in the item you just dragged home from the Apple Store. That was the threat, and we applied ourselves to it, quite frankly, while everyone else was still trying to work out how to spell email.
The people elect them, pay for them, trust them, and are bosses of them. And governments who allow themselves to forget that will hear the voice of the people in every chatroom, on every blog, on every Twitter feed and, eventually, from every square, rising from Tiananmen Square to Tahrir Square, from Trafalgar to Times, with ripples through every letter of the alphabet. And governments who stand against this truth are done for. What was freedom of the press for one organisation was not freedom for another.
They [the media] went to war with me and totally forgot what the opposition was. Opponents past and present have the same essential weakness about them: Friendship, in my experience, will only buy you about nine hours of free labour. It was frustrating. But I now see it as an important factor in the way we see the world through the media.
Next on FRONTLINE
And we saw ourselves as journalists from the start. Better ones. Men in their prime, if they have convictions, are tasked to act on them. To me, a great number of those working for liberal causes are not only shy but borderline collusive. A lot of people who cover world affairs from Washington are basically stupid. These people are pretty desperate and they should be ashamed, most probably, of how much complacency and ignorance they have brought into the world. But the great thrust of our work is to save lives.
By making a contribution, in the public interest, to the ending of wars, by supplying journalists with the means to keep a check on the excesses of power, we aim to limit the hunger for killings, skirmishes and invasions, as well as to limit the effectiveness of the lies that support them.
Aug 19, Phillip rated it really liked it. For the record it is ghost written and basically a first draft of an autobiography that he pulled the plug on. Yes it could be construed as propaganda on his behalf, but with entire governments and traditional media outlets portraying him as a traitor and sexual deviant, how else can he tell his side of the story? Sep 23, Miriam marked it as niet-uitgelezen.
Verschrikkelijke schrijfstijl, ik zoek wel een ander boek over Assange. View 1 comment. We just got this into the store on Tuesday, and taking a look at it, I was pretty excited to read it, and to get a long inside account of Wikileaks. I wasn't aware, however, of all the controversy over its publication. The note from the publisher in the beginning of the book suggests it, but still seems misleading, having also read this: Still, it was a compelling read, and great to have the Wikileaks story all in one place, told even if this telling is co We just got this into the store on Tuesday, and taking a look at it, I was pretty excited to read it, and to get a long inside account of Wikileaks.
Still, it was a compelling read, and great to have the Wikileaks story all in one place, told even if this telling is complicated by various authorial questions raised by the circumstances of the book's publication from the person most intimately involved. In many ways, an inspiring piece, one that weaves together both a story of how the slow build-up of personal experiences over one's life may lead one to great insight on a particular piece of the world, with a philosophy of what it is to challenge power with technology in particular time and place.
Sep 11, Stephen rated it really liked it. A compulsory read for an understanding of this fascinating character. Is it ego or altruism that drives Assange? It is a fast, interesting read and certainly shines a bright light in the face of governments who do not like to be questioned - and shouldn't we all be questioning our governments?
Sep 30, Michelle MacAleese rated it really liked it.
This man is fascinating--he's the most super-intelligent car-wreck ever. And Andrew O'Hagen has done a great job.We weren't expecting this outcome. I've had, or remembered, more asleep-dreams about him than about any other famous person. I nation of nuclear gophers, lifeless in their burrows. This would be to contain the rise of informatic power by containing its means of distribution. Julian: I agree.